Quantcast

North Bay Business Journal

Monday, August 9, 2010, 2:40 am

The homes are green even if paperwork isn’t

By

Print Friendly Print Friendly    

Share this item

    New materials raise efficiency; foregoing cost of certification

    NORTH BAY — Homebuilding in the North Bay has slowed to a trickle in the past few years, but a number of the custom homes are being built greener than even the newly increased state green-building standards.

    Yet the impact of the economy is being reflected somewhat in whether owners of such home projects put out the additional cost of having them third-party certified under a green-building rating system.

    Leff Construction is building a structurally insulated panel home in Cazadero that won’t be LEED for Homes-certified.

    In the western Sonoma County community of Cazadero, Leff Construction of Sebastopol is almost done with the exterior of a nearly 4,000-square-foot home, the builder’s first project with structurally insulated panels, or SIPs, according to President David Leff. Sebastopol architect Marilyn Standley recommended the home be built with SIPs, initial LEED certification-related energy modeling by AIM Associates of Petaluma.

    “It was designed for LEED for Homes Gold or Platinum, and it will be built to meet standards for those specifications,” Mr. Leff said. “But the client decided they were not interested in spending the extra money for documentation and certification.”

    Doing so would have added an estimated $6,000 to $10,000 to the cost of the project for documentation and a third-party certifier, he said. Still, he plans to do performance-related adjustments to the finished home, such as blower-door leak testing and systems commissioning.

    Panelized construction involves wall and sometimes roof panels built in a factory out of wood or light-gauge steel framing, delivered to the job site on trucks and moved into position.

    That can result in less waste that would need to be recycled and faster construction. The Cazadero house will have a framed exterior in two months, instead of four to frame walls on-site, partly enclose them and spray in closed-cell foam insulation to achieve the same air-tightness of SIP panels, Mr. Leff said.

    SIPs for the Cazadero project were built in Colorado out of eight inches of polystyrene foam sandwiched between oriented strand board panels, providing insulation ratings of R-40 in the walls and R-60 in the roof.

    Other “very green house-equivalent” features include a large photovoltaic array that will handle electrical demand and store the excess in batteries, hydronic forced-air heating via a recycled-wood pellet furnace and solar thermal rooftop panels.

    However, outage-prone local utilities necessitate installation of a propane-fired backup generator, depriving the project of the net zero-energy design goal, Mr. Leff said.

    Cotati-based custom home builder Hammond & Company has three home projects with highly green features under construction or finishing and a project pipeline of one and a half to two years, according to longtime green-building advocate Bruce Hammond.

    The builder recently finished a 2,000-square-foot house between Cotati and Sebastopol and is under construction on a 6,000-square-foot home compound near Sonoma and a 4,000-square-foot dwelling and studio near the west Marin County community of Nicasio.

    The newly completed home was registered under the LEED for Homes rating system but won’t be certified, he said. The project encountered construction financing challenges because of fluctuating valuations on the home the owners would be moving out of and how much could be applied to financing and capital reserves.

    “It was a struggle with financing a year ago, and the project went through seven or eight banks, even though the people had reliable 1040s and high-level jobs,” he said.

    Documentation required for LEED certification is being compiled but won’t be submitted, according to Mr. Hammond. The Marin project also will be documented for conformance to a high GreenPoint rating but won’t be certified to save an estimated $4,000 in verification costs.

    The Sonoma project at this point is going for Platinum-level LEED certification, Mr. Hammond said. To get to the net zero-energy goal for the project, Timmons Design Engineers of San Francisco came up with a ground-source heat pump that moves water through 12 solar thermal panels on the 1,000-square-foot pool house to provide hot water for domestic purposes. During cold months, a controller moves excess water to subfloor coils. In hot months, the water carries heat from the house to coils stacked four layers deep in three feet of sand under a portion of the house.

    Plumbing contractor LeDuc & Dexter of Santa Rosa is installing the Cazadero, Sonoma and Marin systems.

    Prudence Ferreira, founder of green-project consultancy Integral Impact Inc. and current president of certifying organizations PassivHaus California and the Redwood Empire chapter of the U.S. Green Building Council, said her firm has hired three people in the past six months to handle interest in projects.

    “It might be because some projects are seeking dual or triple certification,” Ms. Ferreira said.

    A number of local governments have pegged their green-building standards to the GreenPoint system. The Green Building Council released its LEED for Homes system last year and has been working to allow alignments with the GreenPoint system.

    The Passive House Institute recently certified Catherine O’Neill’s Sonoma home and nonprofit homebuilder CLAM’s Blue2 home in Pt. Reyes Station under the PassivHaus energy-efficiency and air-quality standard. Blue2 also is going for LEED for Homes and GreenPoint credentials.

    There is a move afoot to remove some of the confusion for project owners and duplication of services needed for certification of homes under multiple green-building standards, according to Ms. Ferreira.

    “We’re trying to put a pathway for PassivHaus consultants to be LEED for Homes and GreenPoint consultants,” she said.

    Copyright © 1988–2014 North Bay Business Journal
    View the policy for linking to website content.

    Print Friendly Print Friendly    

    Comments

    4 Comments

    1. August 9, 2010, 1:21 pm

      by Natasha

      I think it’s great that more and more homes are becoming more sustainable and eco-friendly! But existing homes can be green too. Check out this article for a few ideas on how to use green building products for DIY: http://www.justlivegreener.com/greener-home/308-5-green-building-products-for-diy-projects.html


    2. August 14, 2010, 8:33 pm

      by A

      I can’t imagine a 4000 square foot home taking two to four months to have have a frame up. It only takes us a month or sometimes less from a clear lot to mechanical roughs.


    3. August 15, 2010, 5:02 pm

      by Dave

      I wonder if one can apply the same concepts when renovating a home. Will it be cheaper to build a green home from zero up? The problem with going green is that it can be an expensive option – but which can have greater rewards in the long run. It’s great that many are loving the idea behind sustainability and we can just wait and see how the rest will embrace the very concept of going green. Cheers!


    4. August 17, 2010, 12:41 pm

      by ines

      More and more people become aware of the importance of a eco-friendly way of living and this is a very good thing.


    Submit Your Comments

    Required

    Required, will not be published

    Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments and Letters Policy. To share this item by email or social media, use the links above.

    Do not use this form to contact people, companies or organizations mentioned in this story. Contact them directly. Private messages left here will be deleted.