North Bay Business Journal

Monday, September 27, 2010, 2:48 pm

Critics file suit against new Sutter hospital

Print Friendly Print Friendly    

SANTA ROSA, UPDATED 4:20 p.m. – A lawsuit has been filed by opponents of Sutter Health’s planned new hospital next to the Wells Fargo Center for the Arts – less than a week after the Sacramento-based health organization celebrated a ground breaking ceremony for the $284 million project meant to replace the seismically unsafe Chanate Facility.

The suit, filed Sept. 22 in Sonoma County Superior Court, claims the environmental impact report approved by Sonoma County and the Board of Supervisors is “flawed,” does not conform with the county’s General Plan and is in violation of the California Environmental Quality Act, also known as CEQA. To read the full complaint filed in Sonoma County Superior Court, click here.

The North Sonoma County Healthcare District, which oversees operations of Healdsburg District Hospital, authorized the suit to block development of Sutter’s proposed 82-bed hospital. Joining the healthcare district is Palm Drive Hospital in Sebastopol, the California Nurses Association and the Transportation Solutions Defense and Education Fund, an anti-sprawl organization in the Bay Area.

Sonoma County and the Board of Supervisors are listed as defendants to the case. Sutter Health, Sutter Medical Center of Santa Rosa, Sutter Medical Foundation, Sutter West Bay Hospitals and the Sutter West Bay Medical Foundation are listed as parties of interest.

“The Board of Supervisors made a carefully considered decision in approving the new Sutter hospital, and they did so after preparing a very thorough environmental impact report,” Sutter said in a statement.  “This is a critical project for Sonoma County health care, and for jobs and the local economy,” the statement continued. “It is unfortunate that taxpayers and Sutter have to bear the cost of this lawsuit, but we are confident that the county’s thorough environmental impact report and accompanying studies will demonstrate that the lawsuit lacks merit.”

Sutter spokeswoman Lisa Amador added that the board and the county Planning Commission voted unanimously to certify the EIR.

Throughout the approval process for Sutter’s plan, critics said the location was ill-suited for a new hospital because it would have a negative impact on the surrounding area, particularly with respect to traffic, air quality, noise and the lack of public transportation in the area.

“By approving the project on the basis of this flawed and fragmented environmental analysis,” county officials and the supervisors “made a decision without considering all of the information that they and the public needed to properly weigh the consequences of the county’s actions,” the suit alleges.

But Sutter has said repeatedly that it would assist the county in expanding the public transportation and in widening Mark West Springs Road to accommodate for an increase in traffic. It also says the construction of the hospital, which will include 80,000 square feet of medical office space, would be a significant boon to the economy.

More than 1,500 jobs would be “created and maintained during the planning, design and construction of the new hospital,” Sutter said in August, announcing that nearly a dozen of local companies would be selected to work on the project. About $5.5 million would be paid in mitigation fees to the county upon completion of construction, which is expected to take four years, Sutter said.

Sutter also faces a looming deadline of Dec. 31 of this year to reach certain construction milestones that would grant it an extension in meeting state-mandated seismic upgrades. The Chanate facility, originally built in 1937, is inadequate in seismic requirements, Sutter has said.

It remains unclear if the suit will affect the December deadline and whether or not construction will begin on time.

“The county and Sutter will review the complaint and prepare for the next step in the legal process, which would be to respond to the complaint,” Sonoma County spokesman Jim Leddy said. “No date has been set for the first court review of the complaint and response.”

Judge Robert S. Boyd has been assigned to the case.

Another element of criticism is the impact that the hospital will have on other health care providers, particularly in Northern Sonoma County.

The suit alleges the EIR “fails to analyze the substantial possibility that the project will result in the downsizing or closure of public ‘district’ hospitals and other medical facilities in the region and contains no analysis of the resulting environmental and health impacts.”

The Sierra Club was one critic of the plan, but so far it has no plans of joining the suit.

“I can’t say right now just what step the Sierra Club will take next to make this project more consistent with the climate protection goals of the county and its residents,” said Steve Birdlebough of the Sonoma County Sierra Club chapter.

Sonoma County Health and Human Services also approved of the hospital plan under the 1996 Health Care Access Agreement, which stipulates that Sutter must provide a certain level of care for the uninsured and indigent populations after it took over operations at the former Community Hospital on Chanate Drive.

Copyright © 1988–2012 North Bay Business Journal
View the policy for linking to website content.

Print Friendly Print Friendly    

Comments

10 Comments

  1. September 27th, 2010 3:53 pm

    Funny … Healdsburg General Hospital is located in a much more secluded location than the new Sutter Hospital. Last time I checked it was at the intersection of major roads heading in all four directions. Highway 101 North and South. River Road to the West. And, Mark West Springs Road to the East (servicing upper Napa Valley). What is the REAL reason HBG General…Sour Grapes ??? Igor says a lot is going to be exposed real soon ……

    by Igor


  2. September 27th, 2010 4:03 pm

    I don’t quite understand how a hospital with excellent freeway access pose any environmental problems. Seeing the nurses’ union is a plaintiff, i guess it’s just another opportunity to obstruct things and tomake work (and money) lawyers.

    by jdangius


  3. September 27th, 2010 4:05 pm

    Challenges to EIR’s have now become legalized extortion.

    by David


  4. September 27th, 2010 4:09 pm

    The sierra club at it again, did you know sierra club filed a lawsuit agaisnt the corp of engineers in New Orleans in 88 or 89, kept them ( corp of engineers ) from rebuilding new dikes.
    Katrina may never of happen
    Sutter Hospital would bring many jobs to Sonoma County
    now we know why companys are leaving california to many restictions

    by frank


  5. September 27th, 2010 5:07 pm

    Follow the money. Unions, lawyers, Sierra Club… narcissistic extortion artists. The public be damned. Who wrote the laws that set-up this racket?

    Lee

    by lee parker


  6. September 27th, 2010 5:32 pm

    Progressive California

    by Kevin


  7. September 27th, 2010 5:55 pm

    Actually the impact of all the traffic going to this location will be major for highway 101 and the local community. The traffic back-up onto 101 will block the right lane. It will spread Santa Rosa’s knot of traffic congestion north along Old Redwood Highway and spoil what was a delightful little community at Larkfield. There is a Kaiser not far away; another hospital in Healdsburg and a large health clinic at Fountain Grove. The South side of Santa Rosa needs more health facilities, not the north end. It is nice that Sutter will provide a few temporary construction jobs, but try not to let that blind you to the fact that we don’t need a hospital in that location and the impact on the local community will be a disaster.

    by gerry2280


  8. September 27th, 2010 7:55 pm

    The proposed location is in the county. Hospitals, like dense home development and businesses belong in incorporated cities that are equipped to provide city services.

    by Ray Peterson


  9. September 28th, 2010 7:14 am

    The traffic argument doesn’t make sense. Diverting hosptial traffic off of Santa Rosa’s streets up to the existing Chanate location has to be better. Also, if you read the articles, the plan involves adding a lane to the River Road off-ramp and increasing the width of Mark West Springs Road. It is also important to keep in mind that this is a “County” hospital. The central location seves the whole County, it’s not intended to provide better coverage for the city of Santa Rosa.

    by Thomas


  10. September 28th, 2010 9:39 am

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lybip7ibO24

    This link has a video of a sutter organization polluting everyone around them. Nobody wants to touch them. Once their in that’s it.

    by richmond grove asn.


Submit Your Comments

Required

Required, will not be published

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. Do not use this form to contact companies or organizations mentioned in this story. Contact them directly. For more information, please see our Comments and Letters Policy. To share this item by email or social media, use the links above.