With no action from Congress, planners, people, left in lurch
[caption id="attachment_17441" align="alignright" width="176" caption="Frederick Caspersen"][/caption]
Some, like Frederick Caspersen, partner at Farella Braun + Martel, a San Francisco-based law firm with an office in St. Helena, expected the exemption rate to stay the same, at $3.5 million for individuals, at least for the time being, and the tax rate to stay the same as well, at 45 percent.
But now, he said, “I don’t think we will have a long-term solution until 2011. Congress doesn’t like to make changes before an election.”
He had expected a patch for 2010, something Congress could easily do so it wouldn’t have to come up with a permanent fix.
That was the expectation for most, that Congress would either make a permanent or temporary fix that would keep the tax at the $3.5 million level and at the 45 percent rate or perhaps go to $1 million, but there was a consensus among tax professionals that some form of legislation would come down.
However, in a surprise move, Congress did nothing and the estate tax expired, making it virtually impossible for estate planners to work with their clients. The House passed its version of the bill to extend the precedent for another year, but the Senate did not.
Dell Coats, partner with G&J Seiberlich in Napa, said doing any planning at all is difficult now because of the uncertainty.
In a letter addressed to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Republican Leader Mitch McConnell, the chairman of the Senate Committee on finance, Max Baucus, and the ranking member of the same committee, Chick Grassley, said they intend to address the extension of various tax provisions expiring on or before Dec. 31, 2009 early in the year.
[caption id="attachment_16143" align="alignleft" width="108" caption="Joni Fritsche"][/caption]
Joni Fritsche of Burr Pilger Mayer in Santa Rosa said the letter shows that the Senate knows it needs to make a decision soon.
“I have never seen a letter like this before,” she said. “It is like they are saying, ‘Oops, we messed up.’”
She said there are 6,000 estates that are impacted by the tax in 2010.
Ms. Fritsche said that if Congress comes back and passes a tax, it would technically not be able to make it retroactive to the beginning of the year.
“You cannot enact a tax retroactively,” she said.
That means that anyone who dies before something is passed will have estates that are not subject to an estate tax, although they may be subject to taxes on increases values of some assets.
[caption id="attachment_16142" align="alignright" width="108" caption="Steve Goldberg"][/caption]
Steve Goldberg, an estate planning attorney and partner at Friedemann Goldberg LLP in Santa Rosa, said it is a bad result for upper to middle class America.
“They have left a mess. It is unfair for the estate planning community and our clients,” Mr. Goldberg said.
“Unless they fix this soon, we are going to have to come up with two estate plans, one for now, before anything happens, and one for later when they fix this thing.”