California’s headlong race to write its rules for the legal cannabis marketplace before Jan. 1, when recreational business can commence, took a leap Thursday with the release of a comprehensive set of temporary regulations for the emerging industry.
The long-awaited guidelines cover everything from dosage amounts of psychoactive THC in marijuana products to facility inspections and authorized businesses, ranging from delivery services to small manufacturers with shared facilities.
The regulations will enable the state to begin issuing temporary licenses for cannabis businesses in January, when recreational sales become legal.
Cannabis industry leaders overall had positive feedback about 278 pages of rules developed over months. The most controversial aspect of the regulations is what’s missing: Any limit to the size of cannabis farms.
That immediately posed a threat to established growers, including the smaller operations that blanket the North Coast.
“It is going to be a catastrophe if California increases our supply of cannabis. The marketplace is already flooded,” said Hezekiah Allen, executive director of the California Growers Association.
The regulations have been in development for many months and in some cases covered familiar ground: At first, the state will issue only temporary licenses to growers and retailers, provided they have a local permit to open for business. The state has been trying to identify the appropriate size limit for cannabis farmers, a debate that has echoed fights over corporate-scale farming in the Midwest.
On Monday, the state Department of Food and Agriculture issued an environmental impact report that proposed a 1-acre cap on cannabis farms and nurseries.
But by Thursday, the same agency issued rules that put no limit on farms, apparently opening the door for large-scale cultivation in California.
Steve Lyle, spokesman with the department, said in an email the 1-acre limit “was left out following evaluation of the emergency regulations, including input from stakeholders, that went on right up until the regulations were finalized.”
The regulations won’t expand the size of cannabis farms allowed in Sonoma County, where cultivators can grow no more than an acre of cannabis.
Under state law, local jurisdictions can craft policies limiting the local marketplace, such as the size of farms and the types of businesses allowed.
Erich Pearson, executive director of SPARC dispensaries in Sonoma County and San Francisco, has a 1-acre farm in Glen Ellen, which was partially burned in last month’s fires. Pearson called the regulations “a monumental step forward” and said it was a “relief” to finally have a comprehensive guidebook.
He said he hasn’t yet analyzed how the regulations will impact his businesses in Sonoma County, but he’s optimistic.
Nick Caston, a cannabis industry consultant and board member of the Sonoma County chapter of the California Cannabis Industry Association, said allowing large farms is good for manufacturers that would rather source flowers from one farm versus many small farms.
The rules give a six-month grace period before more stringent distinctions between recreational and medical cannabis apply, a transition period that will make it easier for dispensaries and other businesses to stay afloat while many businesses are still getting local permits and state licenses, Caston said.
On the other hand, Proposition 64 supporters campaigned last year with a promise there would be a five-year buffer before the state would allow large-scale cannabis farms, Caston said.